Priced‑In Flaws: from cars to colleagues to couples

“You Bought the Orange Car—Quit Complaining It’s Not Blue”

if you buy an orange car, no use later complaining that it isn’t blue.

you knew it was orange when you bought it. maybe you did not like the color at the time, but you liked the other qualities about the car enough that you decided to buy that car over all the other options you had. Orange was already priced-in when you bought it.

now if you bought a blue car but it randomly starting rusting and turned orange … well now you have something to complain about.

the same is true for people.

if you hire someone that is brilliant but you know will have trouble meeting deadlines, it is kind of hard to complain when they don’t meet deadlines. you knew that when you hired them. even if they told you they plan on getting better on hitting deadlines at the time of hire (and failed in that plan), it is kind of hard to blame them. you still hired the person knowing of their big flaw … because presumably their other strengths more than made up for their flaws.

in this case, you can blame yourself for making a bad decision … but blaming the employee is unfair.

like the product, if the person sells themself that they are great at meeting deadlines and is not, than it is a clear misrepresentation and you can justifiably be miffed that you were duped. But if you already know they are bad at hitting deadlines, that flaw should be priced-in.

“Buyer’s Remorse Is Just Bad Math: Factor the Flaws Before You Commit”

it is true for romantic partner too. if you know someone is always late to events and you marry them anyway … you presumably priced-in the flaw when you made your decision to “buy the product”. your partner being late might make you mad and cause some buyer’s remorse … but it would be unfair to take it out on your spouse since you knew that was a flaw all along and you married them anyway – presumably because of all their great strengths. The flaw of being late was priced-in when you made the decision.

like a product, if your spouse used to be super punctual but then decided that punctuality was no longer a virtue, then you have a right to be peeved. this is even true in the extreme. if you marry someone that has cheated on a previous spouse, you have to know there is a high probability that they will cheat on you. past performance predicts future behavior.

if you fell in love with a super ambitious person and then they decided to retire … you have a right to be brought along on that decision. but if they were never ambitious to begin with, you don’t really have a right to be angry at them when they don’t prioritize making money.

every product has big weaknesses and so does every person. whether you buy a product, hire a person, or marry a spouse … you are implicitly weighing the person’s strengths and weaknesses. when you make a buying decision, you are making a decision that the strengths significantly outweigh the weaknesses. You are pricing it in.

in an enduring relationship with a product or person, the strengths grow over time and the weakness are less pronounced. that’s the best scenario. those are the products you keep forever, the colleagues you work with across multiple companies, and the marriages that last a lifetime.

before you buy, you evaluate the product to make an educated decision. but even after you buy, the quality of the relationship with that product or person depends on you as much as it does on them. if you take care of your house, it will last a long time. if you neglect your home, you’ll end up with a leaky roof.

regret is just the invoice for ignoring the sticker price.

---

note: Flex Capital invests in 100 seed-stage start-ups per year (2 per week). typical check is $400k. please reach out if you know amazing founders that want to change the world.

---

X of the week:

Founders are accidentally donating millions to the IRS

a deep dive into QSBS, now with 67% more joy thanks to the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBA)

Founders and early investors routinely accidentally gift-wrap millions of dollars to the government. Not because they’re feeling generous, but because they did not take full advantage of Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS).

QSBS is one of the most powerful tools for founders and early investors, yet most ignore it like the gym membership they swore they’d use. Introduced in 1993 and significantly improved in 2010, QSBS lets you eliminate federal taxes (and most state taxes) on startup gains if you meet certain criteria. The recent (2025) One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBA) has made QSBS even better.

Ignoring QSBS is like walking past a suitcase filled with tax-free Lamborghinis because bending down to pick it up seems inconvenient.

Most founders remain unaware or think QSBS is complicated. Meanwhile, savvy investors quietly stuff duffel bags with millions more at every exit.

QSBS isn’t complicated. Here’s the old Cheat Code:

• Hold qualifying startup stock for five years, and pay zero taxes on your gains. This applies to founders, early employees, and investors.

• The benefit used to max out at either $10 million or 10x your investment (whichever is higher).

But QSBS just got a big upgrade under the Trump OBBA.

1. Faster Wins: Now, you don’t even need to wait five years for partial benefits.

• Hold stock for 3 years, exclude 50% of your gains.

• Hold for 4 years, exclude 75%.

• Hold for 5+ years, keep 100% of your gains.

It’s like frequent flyer status, but for escaping taxes.

2. Bigger Tax-Free Exits: The lifetime exclusion cap jumped from $10 million to $15 million. That’s an extra $5 million in your pocket instead of funding another DMV renovation.

3. Larger Companies Qualify: OBBA increased the eligibility limit from $50 million to $75 million in gross assets, meaning most Series A companies no longer have to cry themselves to sleep.

4. Inflation Adjustments: Caps now automatically increase with inflation every year. QSBS is the tax benefit that ages better than Paul Rudd.

5. 10x Rule Lives On: You can still exclude up to 10x your original investment every year, no matter how much above the cap you are. (your spreadsheet just popped a champagne bottle.)

Let’s say two founders, Jenny and Sean, each make $15 million after selling their companies. Sean ignored QSBS and walked away with just under $10 million after taxes. Jenny planned carefully, met the QSBS requirements and took home the entire $15 million.

That $5 million difference is: enough to fund your next company, buy a massive house, and hire a full-time chef who only makes artisanal breakfast sandwiches with avocados from the remote Andes. Why donate that money to the government?

Yet, many founders and investors don’t structure their companies to qualify for QSBS, either because they are unaware or think it’s too bureaucratic, like assembling IKEA furniture blindfolded. It isn’t.

To qualify for QSBS, check these boxes:

• Your company (or the one you invest in) must be a domestic C-corporation.

• You must acquire stock directly from the company for cash, property, or services. (SAFE notes? The clock starts when they convert, not when you start bragging about them.)

• The company's assets must be below $75 million at and immediately after issuance.

• The company must actively engage in a qualified business (most tech startups qualify unless your startup is “Meditation for Lizards” or something super really weird).

• You can't hedge your investment (no offsetting short positions).

At Flex Capital, we ensure every founder and LP maximizes QSBS benefits. A 3x seed fund with QSBS significantly outperforms a 4x fund.

(Yes, we’re flexing. It’s in the name.)

if you want to see the numbers you can run your own scenario on our calculator and play with the numbers. (it’s like TurboTax, but fun—and it might make you rich.)

---

if you like this article, please do three things:

1. share it with someone you admire

2. follow me (@auren) on X

3. subscribe to the “World of DaaS” podcast

(if you hate this, please share with all your enemies)